I hope you caught my inaugural post in The Lost Ogle yesterday in which I laid out the coming financial downfall of Oklahoma and, sadly, in particular, the Oklahoma City area because we fracked our way into a mess and forgot we live on a planet with other countries and people.
Shortly after the post was published, state officials announced the state's coming budget shortfall has been doubled to more than $600 million. I DO think this number will rise.
Here's an excerpt from the post, published in Oklahoma City's most popular and irreverent blog:
Drill, baby, drill, has been the conservative mantra for “energy independence” from the world and freedom for people to drive Hummers again without embarrassment for displaying their “wasty ways”, as American novelist James Fenimore Cooper’s character Natty Bumppo would describe it. Yet drill, baby, drill, has put Oklahoma at risk once again. Drill, baby, drill? Why are we bringing “babies” into this muddle of geopolitics and neo-American colonialism? How about, drill, wasps, drill?
Here's the link to the entire post. I know it's a long post. It rambles. It meanders. It contains obscure references to serious literary figures and significant old rock songs. It's "wordy," people, yes, "wordy." Basically, it's your typical DocHoc train wreck of playfulness, frustration and, well, stirring up trouble by speaking truth to power. But can only power speak truth to power?
I really want to hear what you think about my new collaboration with TLO. Comment about it on Okie Funk's Facebook site.
But one thing I also want to point out today is that this little inconsequential blog, Okie Funk, predicted on Feb. 2 the state would eventually face a $1 billion budget shortfall because of oil field layoffs and declining gross production tax revenues. I hope it doesn't get that bad, but, for now, I'm sticking by that number. I think I win the you-were-right cigar at this point, anyway.
What's incredibly amazing is that that the mainstream media here and those brilliant "think" tanks that have done so much to help our state in recent years completely ignored this prediction and just regurgitated "experts"--basically themselves talking to each other--that said oil prices were going to rebound and all would be well.
This is the problem with the mainstream media here and the think tanks and the self-proclaimed experts. They are insular and afraid and arrogant. They either exist only for profit or themselves. The funny thing about the mainstream media profiteers is that you can actually make loads of money with truthful, irreverent reporting that is honest and true, but they won't do it because they are stuck in old timey models of journalism and boring rhetorical formats developed in the nineteenth century. The think tanks just become about writing their bland "reports" or "studies" that do nothing but quantify the obvious, and even then they won't step out of the boxes. They are about sustaining themselves as organizations, not helping people or making this a better place.
The Lost Ogle and this little blog that's only been around since 2004 tell it like it is whether you like the style or not, and the mainstream media and the think tanks don't even have the decency to acknowledge it's reporting information that's, really, old news. TLO had it first or Okie Funk said it two weeks ago. That's the way it goes these days.
Many of you might be wondering why I haven't posted my usual Wednesday Okie Funk piece today.
The short answer is that it will appear on a different and much more popular site and in a different format tomorrow morning. I will then link to that post here. The longer answer is that I'm reformatting and rethinking how I want to proceed with Okie Funk, which I've published since 2004. I will continue to publish on this site in the foreseeable future, but its basic content might change somewhat and its frequency might be reduced. This could change, however, and I'm looking forward to listening to your views about it. You can always comment on this blog using Facebook.
As you know, I've never accepted any advertising on Okie Funk nor do I plan to do so in the future. This has helped to keep the blog free from outside interference. But now I do need supportive collaborators, new partners and a different direction. It has also NOT always been a labor of love to keep Okie Funk going. I'm a busy college English professor with administrative duties in my department, and that has always come first. For my detractors who believe I'm some ego-driven writer with a dysfunctional need for attention, I say, "Hey, people, you're talkers. Talkers make me thirsty. Buy me two beers." I concede the unevenness of my posts through the years, but I've done some good on this blog, which has been recognized locally and nationally.
It comes down this this: Even more change is on its way for this blog and for, really, many media outlets locally and nationally as all of us in our world culture still grapple with how to report the news and comment on it editorially with new technological advances and with the influence of the Internet and, of course, social media.
I'm not going away, to the disappointment of some people here I suppose. I'm just reinventing myself once again.--Kurt Hochenauer
The religious fundamentalists here who want to keep our school kids as dumb and unsuccessful as possible have introduced yet another “Religious Viewpoints Antidiscrimination Act" bill in the Oklahoma Legislature.
These types of bills have been regularly defeated or vetoed in the past, but I must say the bill introduced this session, in its current form, is one of the most loony and unconstitutional measures I’ve ever read in my more than 30 years of writing about politics in the great state of Oklahoma.
Here’s the bill as introduced. Read it word for word like I did. Cray cray, 4.3. (No, wait. 4.3? That’s the magnitude of the earthquake I just felt because of the injection well process used in the current fracking bust here that’s about ready to destroy the Oklahoma economy and ruin lives. I digress.) This latest religious-intrusion bill is a rambling, overly qualified, disingenuous cartoon of rhetorical nonsense. It should be enshrined as one of the worst legislative bills ever written in the history of the planet. (Full apologies to the legislative staff member/attorney who had to put this slop together in some semblance of coherence. ) The bill’s language should be carved out in stone and placed next to the state Capitol’s Ten Commandments monument. My fellow Okies, let us now bow our heads in prayer to Our Oklahoma God of Mediocrity and forgive those who make this state a laughingstock to the rest of the world. Amen.
The concept of the bill implies that somehow our school kids just don’t get to express their religious views enough. This is a blatant falsehood. First, schools are about learning how to write and think and do math and know about how things work on a scientific level. If some kid wants to pray before taking a test they didn’t study for the night before then have at it, son. No one in the world is against that.
What the normal civilized, intelligent world is against is that kid demanding everyone else in the school say the same prayer with him publicly and then demanding an A on a test because the objective test questions don’t include opt-out references for fundamentalist Christians, who want this country to become a theocracy.
So here’s the test question. How does a tadpole develop? A. It metamorphosizes. B. It grows under banana trees in tropical climates. C. It grows one extra limb over 10,000 years. D. The Christian God made the tadpole for HIS special purposes. Correct answer: Either A or D. In all seriousness, the religious fundamentalists here want this type of testing and related curriculum in our schools, and we have to stop it, ALL of us, whether you’re a believer in a God or not.
Let’s take a look at some of the language in the bill. It really pains me to do this. It’s a beautiful day outside. I want to go to one of my favorite parks right now yet here I am reading through this sneaky and, frankly, immoral bill and writing about it. Can I get a break or at least more than two likes on Facebook?
So here’s the main thrust of Senate Bill 21, introduced by Republican state Sen. Mark Allen of Spiro, Oklahoma:
A school district shall treat the voluntary expression of a student of a religious viewpoint, if any, on an otherwise permissible subject in the same manner the district treats the voluntary expression by a student of a secular or other viewpoint on an otherwise permissible subject and may not discriminate against the student based on a religious viewpoint, if any, expressed by the student on an otherwise permissible subject.
Before I dissect the above argument, let me just quote from Allen’s legislative profile on the Oklahoma Legislature’s site: “Mark is a firm believer in God and country and the Constitution our United States was built on, and praises the men and women who defend it.” The profile notes, Allen “served in the U.S. Navy Seabees as a heavy equipment operator from 1968-1970.”
I would say, respectfully, to Senator Allen that my father was a Marine Corps officer who served in both the Korean and Vietnam Wars. Here’s a quote by him from an affidavit when he later helped a fellow solider get the Medal of Honor for his actions in only just one fire fight in which my father was involved. My father was involved in a lot of fire fights as an attack commander in the Marine Corps. He taught me how to fight.
Retired Lt. Col. Max J. Hochenauer’s affidavit states, “ ... when the fire fight started ... the noise was deafening. The enemy started firing anti-aircraft guns as anti-personnel weapons. It appeared to be two separate fire power demonstrations being conducted at once and the noise was almost unbearable.
“The mortars and artillery added more noise. When our evacuation helicopters arrived, they drew heavy machine-gun fire from the enemy and tracers filled the sky.”
My father, long gone from this world because of war injuries, which included suffering through a massive amount of hand grenade shrapnel that was medically impossible to entirely remove from his body in his life, would absolutely oppose Allen’s bill as I do.
So you get the picture. It’s the same dreary, suffocating one we’ve looked at for years and years on the metaphorical walls of our state political gallery. It’s just a different person and a little bit different but much more obsessive language. The main point is to allow students to speak about their religious beliefs at public school events, such as graduate ceremonies and football games. Football is important in this bill. I will get to that later.
But the bill’s language is built on a logical fallacy. There is no discrimination of religion in any public school in Oklahoma. If kids want to pray before they eat their lunch at school, they can pray. Bless us, O Lord, and these Thy gifts, which we are about to receive from Thy bounty, through Christ our Lord. Amen. Hurray, it’s corndog day! Jeb, I’ll trade you my sugary canned peaches for your frozen, processed tater tots fried to perfection by our school cooks.
If kids want to debate the subtleties of passages in the Bible or the Koran on the playground instead of playing kickball, then they can do so. If kids want to talk to each other in school hallways between classes about all the wild happenings at their Wednesday night youth meetings at the local Baptist church, then they will do so. It’s life here. It’s what happens in Oklahoma.
But what’s not right, and what will never be right, is allowing students to use public facilities to try to convert people to their particular religious beliefs, say, at a graduation ceremony. I know it gets tricky here. A valedictorian, for example, might mention their pastor as a positive influence in her life in a graduation speech, and I have no problem with that, but proselytizing SHALL NOT be allowed. It’s a sound policy to keep church and state—the “state” as in our public schools—separate. It minimizes the chance for religious conflict. It’s also unconstitutional. Why can’t that same valedictorian proselytize about the relationship between her achievements and Christianity at her own mega-church? Film it. Put in on Facebook.
I’m even more concerned about this language in the bill:
Students may express their beliefs about religion in homework, artwork, and other written and oral assignments free from discrimination based on the religious content of their submissions. Homework and classroom assignments shall be judged by ordinary academic standards of substance and relevance and against other legitimate pedagogical concerns identified by the school district. Students shall not be penalized or rewarded on account of the religious content of their work.
As a longtime English professor here, let me give you a hypothetical but specific example of what could happen. Many of you might be familiar with the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley or at least know the basic story. What if a student submitted a paper about that novel to me in which she argued that Victor Frankenstein’s fatal flaw was that he didn’t give his life over to Jesus Christ? Now, there’s not a lot of overt religious-related actions in the novel at all, and while thematically the novel does deal with the creation of life, there’s nothing in it to suggest such a narrow interpretation or to promote such a huge generalization. A Christian could say that about any flawed character in any novel or short story or poem or film. So would I, or any teacher, be discriminating against this student if I challenged her argument?
Hey, here’s the reality in Oklahoma. I, along with many other teachers, wouldn’t probably even deal with it. My comment might be: Ms. Kern, this was a decent attempt at writing an essay. You made some points about Jesus and Victor Frankenstein, who made that poor guy that he then rejected. You also have several mechanical writing errors in your essay. You should schedule an appointment in our writing center. Let’s talk about how we can schedule your appointment after class on Tuesday. Points: 70. Grade: C-. I would also know in my heart that unless this student eventually adjusted her world view she would never graduate from college.
Obviously, the bill would allow students to also completely dismiss any type of science dealing with the theory of evolution and the chemical origins of life forms by using their lazy and dumb “Christian pass card.” If I could have used such a card as a student back in the 1970s to get an A in a class, I probably would have done it, too. So, let me get this straight, Sally. You’re telling me I don’t have to learn any of this stuff in this science class. I just need to say the Lord Jesus Christ is my savior and I get an A. YES?! I’ll do it even though I’m Jewish. Don’t tell my parents, please.
I’ve written for years and years about these crazy bills, and I’ve used this same type of logic and sarcastic voice. Will this be the year the Oklahoma Legislature really passes such a dishonest and unconstitutional bill that will result in lawsuits and religious conflict in our schools? The numbers are there for this to happen in our Republican-dominated legislature. Gov. Mary Fallin might veto it since she’s in her last term and she has toned down some of her conservative rhetoric, but who knows for sure? I sense many of our Republican lawmakers here have become embittered because same-sex marriage is now allowed in this conservative state and they want some God-fearing payback.
I want to go outside, dear readers, but I need to get back to my initial point about how this bill is one of the looniest legislative measures I’ve ever read. The bill, for example, “sets forth” the “Model Religious Viewpoints Antidiscrimination Policy.”
It makes a special reference to the "captain or captains of the varsity football team.” Note “football” here. What about the captains of the varsity disc golf team or lacrosse team or the girls’ basketball team? It refers to “students who have attained special positions of honor in the school have traditionally addressed school audiences from time to time as a tangential component of their achieved positions of honor, such as . . . prom kings and queens . . .” The qualifications and ridiculous specificity are immense. Here’s one: “The subject of the addresses shall be related to the purpose of the graduation ceremony; marking and honoring the occasion; honoring the participants and those in attendance; and the perspective of the student on purpose, achievement, life, school, graduation and looking forward to the future.”
So we shouldn’t allow creative approaches to commencement addresses? Should they all be the same, praise the lord, pass the ammunition?
Here’s one that strikes me personally and deeply as an English professor:
If the assignment of a teacher involves writing a poem, the work of a student who submits a poem in the form of a prayer, for example a psalm, should be judged on the basis of academic standards, including literary quality, and not penalized or rewarded on account of its religious content.
Yes, a prayer can be aesthetically beautiful even though I don't believe in G/god. As a musician, I've been a member of more church choirs than probably 99.99 percent of the people reading this. I love the sentiment, come here, come here, the acceptance, the softness of church. But it's too right-wing and exclusive for me. We have so many churches here and we need more medical doctors. Students would know a teacher couldn't give a low grade to a religious poem if this bill was passed.
High school football captains, prom kings and queens, prayers instead of poems, say this but don’t say that, it’s not only okay, students, but really on the DL it’s mandated you refer to Jesus Christ in the graduation address, all in a big muddle of a seriously flawed and unconstitutional bill that should never be signed into law.
The bill has been referred to the Oklahoma Senate Judiciary Committee for some odd reason. It only takes a couple of minutes to send a simple one- or two-line email to the committee members to express opposition to the bill.